Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:35
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why is that Hag Hillary Clinton so quiet these days? She is the dog that isn't barking
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
If you could instantly cancel one social norm, what would it be?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Longtime Nike executive named interim president of Portland WNBA franchise - OregonLive.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
The Best Father's Day Gift Ideas for Every Type of Dad - IGN
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Where's the Civil War everyone on the left said would happen?